- Where to Buy Japanese Knives in Japan: Guide to Tokyo, Osaka, Kyoto & Traditional Blade Towns
- Your guide to buying Japanese knives in Japan. Top shops in Tokyo, Osaka & Kyoto, plus blade-making towns like Sakai and Seki.
Last updated:

For people in the Edo period (1603–1868), the sight of a samurai walking with two swords—long and short—at his waist was an everyday scene.
But on March 28, 1876 (Meiji 9), that scene was outlawed.
The Meiji government issued the Haitōrei, the Sword Abolition Edict, which banned the wearing of swords (taitō) in public, the very symbol of the samurai class, with the exception of soldiers, police officers, and a few other categories.
The Haitōrei was not simply about no longer being able to wear a sword. In the same year, samurai stipends were also abolished, and a few years earlier they had already lost their monopoly on military service. With the Haitōrei, the last visible mark of their status was taken away. In effect, this was the moment “samurai as a profession” came to an end.
Why was carrying a sword at the waist suddenly forbidden? Did the samurai accept it quietly? And how long did the edict remain on the books?
This article walks through the content and background of the Haitōrei, the resistance of the warrior class, the hardship of swordsmiths, and the long path that led from this 1876 decree to modern Japan.
The formal name of the Haitōrei is “The Edict Prohibiting the Wearing of Swords Except by Those in Court Dress, the Military, and the Police in Uniform”. It was issued on March 28, 1876 (Meiji 9) as Daijōkan Decree No. 38.

A “Daijōkan Decree” was a law issued by the Daijōkan, the Grand Council of State that served as the highest organ of government at the time. It was the equivalent of national legislation today.

A common misunderstanding is that the Haitōrei outlawed the possession of swords altogether. It did not.

| Action | Status under the Haitōrei |
|---|---|
| Wearing a sword at the waist in public (taitō) | Prohibited |
| Owning a sword at home | Not prohibited |
| Buying or selling swords | Not prohibited |
What was banned was specifically “openly wearing a sword at the waist.” Simply owning a sword was not a crime. Violators had their swords confiscated, but some who refused to comply tried to argue around the rule by carrying their swords on their shoulders or hanging them from cords, claiming “this is not taitō.”
The Haitōrei included exceptions. The following people could continue to wear swords:
In other words, only those whose duty was the use of force retained the right to wear a sword in public.

The Haitōrei did not appear out of nowhere. It was the natural outcome of a series of reforms launched by the Meiji Restoration.

Until the end of the Edo period, military and police duties were the work of samurai. The Meiji government, however, aimed to build a modern state that no longer relied on the warrior class.
Two pillars of this shift were:
The army would now be made up of conscripted citizens, and the police would handle public order. Institutionally, the need for samurai to walk around with swords at their waists was disappearing.
The direct trigger for the Haitōrei was a recommendation submitted in December 1875 (Meiji 8) by Yamagata Aritomo, then Army Minister (Rikugun-kyō).

His argument can be summarized roughly as follows.
“In the past, samurai wore swords in order to strike down enemies and defend themselves. But now we have an army organized through conscription and a police force in place. There is no longer any need for individuals to walk around with swords at their waists. The wearing of swords should be prohibited without delay, and the empty pride and violent temperament of the samurai should be removed.”
Once universal conscription and a modern police system were in place, the samurai’s right to wear swords had become an anachronism.
The Meiji government was dismantling the Edo-era class system of samurai, farmers, artisans, and merchants, advancing modernization under the slogan “shimin byōdō” (equality of the four classes).
Within this larger movement, the Haitōrei was positioned as the policy that stripped away the samurai’s last privilege: the right to wear swords. Around the same time, the government also pushed forward the Castle Abolition Edict (Haijōrei, 1873) dismantling castles, and the Haibutsu Kishaku movement against Buddhist temples. Across many fields, the Meiji government was simultaneously dismantling the symbols of Edo Japan.

When discussing the Haitōrei, another edict often comes up alongside it: the Sanpatsu Dattōrei (Cropped Hair and Sword Removal Edict), issued five years earlier in 1871 (Meiji 4).
The two have similar names but very different characters.
The full name of the Sanpatsu Dattōrei is something like “An Edict Permitting Cropped Hair, Civilian Dress, and the Removal of Swords as One Pleases, While Requiring Swords on Formal Occasions.” The lengthy title boils down to:
In other words, it was a permissive edict that broadened choices: keep the topknot and sword as before, or adopt the new look—either is fine. It carried no penalties and was strictly optional.
The problem was that even after the Sanpatsu Dattōrei, very few samurai voluntarily removed their swords. The Edo-period belief that “the sword is the proof of the samurai” remained deeply rooted.
So five years later, the Meiji government strengthened its stance and issued the Haitōrei. This time it was no longer optional, but a binding decree that prohibited the wearing of swords for everyone except soldiers, police officers, and those in formal court dress.
| Item | Sanpatsu Dattōrei (1871) | Haitōrei (1876) |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Optional (liberalization) | Mandatory (prohibition) |
| Scope | Hairstyle and sword - wearing | Sword - wearing only |
| Penalties | None | Confiscation of the violator’s sword |
The samurai had been told “feel free” and largely ignored the offer, so five years later a binding ban was handed down. That is what the Haitōrei was.

To understand the weight of the Haitōrei, you need to know what swords meant to the samurai of the Edo period.
In the Edo period, samurai were the only class permitted to wear the daishō, the paired set of long and short swords.
The sword was both a battlefield weapon and a public identity card that announced “I am a samurai.” That is why it was said that “the soul of the samurai dwells in the sword,” a sentiment passed down in samurai tradition since the Edo period, and warriors were sternly warned never to treat their swords carelessly.
The Haitōrei stripped away this very symbol of status. The legal foundation of samurai identity was being removed.
For the warrior class, 1876 (Meiji 9) was a particularly brutal year.
| Policy | Year | What was lost |
|---|---|---|
| Conscription Ordinance | 1873 | Monopoly on military service |
| Stipend Disposition (Chitsuroku Shobun) | 1876 | Economic base (family stipends) |
| Haitōrei | March 1876 | Symbol of status (right to wear swords) |
The Chitsuroku Shobun (Stipend Disposition) was a policy that abolished the family stipends paid to samurai households and replaced them with one-time public bonds (kinroku kōsai shōsho). With this, samurai lost their stable income and had no choice but to take up unfamiliar work in commerce, farming, and other fields.
Their monopoly on military service, their salaries, and their badge of identity—the pillars of life as a samurai collapsed one after another in just a few years.
The discontent of the shizoku (the legal designation given to former samurai families under the Meiji government), now stripped of both their economic base and their pride, finally erupted as armed rebellion in the same year the Haitōrei was issued. The first to rise up was the Shinpūren Rebellion (also known as the Keishintō Rebellion) in Kumamoto.

The Shinpūren was a group formed mainly by shizoku of the former Higo Domain (present-day Kumamoto Prefecture).
Their guiding ideology was Ukei Shintō, a system of Shinto thought taught by the kokugaku (National Learning) scholar Hayashi Ōen. Believing that all of life should follow divine will, they strongly rejected the Westernization driven by the Meiji government’s Civilization and Enlightenment movement (Bunmei Kaika). Western clothing, Western food, telegraph wires, and telegrams—all of it was unacceptable to them.
Hayashi Ōen (1798–1870) was a samurai of the Kumamoto Domain and a kokugaku scholar of the late Edo period. He founded the private school Gendōkan and established Higo (present-day Kumamoto) as a center of National Learning. Many of the central figures of the Shinpūren were his direct students or the disciples of his disciples.
Ukei Shintō is the original Shinto philosophy systematized by Hayashi Ōen. 'Ukei' refers to a Shinto rite for divining divine will, and Hayashi placed this practice at the core of a worldview that 'takes the will of the gods as the absolute reference point.' The Shinpūren's fierce rejection of Western influence grew out of this intellectual background.
Then the Haitōrei came down. “A government that takes swords from the warriors goes against the will of the gods.” Convinced of this, they began preparing for an uprising.
In the late hours of October 24, 1876 (Meiji 9), about 170 men rose up.
They were led by their commander Ōtaguro Tomoo, with Kaya Harukata and Saitō Kyūzaburō as his lieutenants.
They split into units and launched a series of attacks.
Against a government army equipped with modern firearms, the Shinpūren fought primarily with swords and spears. It is said that, for religious reasons, they deliberately avoided firearms.
When dawn broke, the government army counterattacked, and the Shinpūren were crushed. Ōtaguro was gravely wounded and committed seppuku, while Kaya, Saitō, and others died in battle. Of the roughly 170 men who took part, 124 were killed in combat or by their own hand. It was a short uprising suppressed in a single day.
News of the Shinpūren Rebellion stirred discontented shizoku in other regions. Within the same month of October, several rebellions broke out in quick succession.
| Rebellion | Date | Location |
|---|---|---|
| Shinpūren Rebellion | October 24, 1876 | Kumamoto District, Kumamoto Prefecture (present - day Kumamoto City) |
| Akizuki Rebellion | October 27, 1876 | Akizuki, Fukuoka Prefecture (present - day Asakura City) |
| Hagi Rebellion | October 28, 1876 | Hagi, Yamaguchi Prefecture |
Each was put down within days, but together they show that anger toward the Haitōrei and the Stipend Disposition was bursting out across Kyushu and into the Chūgoku region.
Then in 1877 (Meiji 10), the largest shizoku rebellion of all broke out: the Satsuma Rebellion (Seinan Sensō).

At the center of the rebellion was Saigō Takamori, a hero of the Meiji Restoration who had left the government over the Korean expedition debate. The Satsuma army he led drew together roughly 30,000 shizoku from across Japan, many of them fueled by anger at the Haitōrei and the Stipend Disposition.
That said, it would be too simplistic to call the Satsuma Rebellion a “protest against the Haitōrei.” Its immediate trigger was a raid by Kagoshima’s private school students on a government arsenal, and Saigō himself never raised opposition to the Haitōrei as his banner.
Even so, the Haitōrei and the Stipend Disposition clearly laid the groundwork for shizoku discontent, and that discontent provided the fuel for a large-scale rebellion.

After fighting that ranged across Kyushu from February to September 1877, Saigō took his own life at Shiroyama in Kagoshima City, and his army was destroyed.
The symbolic moment was that an army of conscripted commoners defeated shizoku skilled with sword and spear. The age in which “only samurai could fight” came to a definitive end here.
After this, armed shizoku resistance faded into the background, and their grievances flowed instead into the Freedom and People’s Rights Movement (Jiyū Minken Undō) led by figures such as Itagaki Taisuke. The era of moving the government with words rather than weapons had begun.
The Haitōrei did not only shake the samurai. The swordsmiths (tōkō / katana-kaji) who had made their swords also lost their work overnight.

One of the hardest hit was Seki, in present-day Gifu Prefecture, one of the two great sword-producing centers of Japan.

But the smiths of Seki had another path to survival. Even toward the end of the Edo period, more and more craftsmen had been making hand-forged blades (uchihamono) other than swords—kitchen knives, sickles, hoes, and other farm tools.
After the Haitōrei wiped out demand for swords, Seki’s smiths shifted in earnest to producing uchihamono. New terms emerged to distinguish “sword smiths” (katana-kaji) from “farm-tool blacksmiths” (nokaji) who made sickles and hoes. Eventually, this expertise became the foundation of Seki’s modern kitchen knife industry, which continues to thrive today.
You can read more about the kitchen knife industry of Seki and Japan in the article below.
While many smiths turned to uchihamono, some continued to devote themselves to swordmaking.
In 1906 (Meiji 39), the two were appointed Imperial Household Artists (Teishitsu Gigeiin), the highest honor for craftsmen at the time.
The Imperial Household Artist system was established in the Meiji era to protect Japanese art and craft, with the imperial family appointing leading masters of fine art and craftsmanship. Gassan Sadakazu and Miyamoto Kanenori were the only two swordsmiths ever appointed. Together, they served as the bridge that carried the nearly extinguished art of Japanese swordmaking to the next generation.
Stripped of practical demand by the Haitōrei, the Japanese sword found new value as a work of art even as it lost its role as a weapon.

In the Meiji era, figures such as Ernest Fenollosa and Okakura Tenshin worked to protect Japanese art, and swords too were recognized as fine craft. At the same time, in the chaos of the period, many famous blades and sword fittings flowed overseas—a darker side of the same chapter.
The Haitōrei remained on the books from 1876 all the way to 1954, a span of 78 years. In practice, however, it was rendered a dead letter by the General Headquarters of the Allied Occupation Forces (GHQ) after World War II.

Japan’s modernization began when the “Black Ships” arrived in a country that had been closed to the outside world during the Edo period. The Haitōrei, born from that modernization, was, fittingly, brought to its final end by the “Black Ship” of the Shōwa era—GHQ.
The Haitōrei effectively lost its force in 1946 (Shōwa 21). Under GHQ occupation, the Firearms and Other Weapons Possession Prohibition Ordinance (Imperial Ordinance No. 300 of 1946) was issued, banning private possession of swords as a general rule.
While the Haitōrei had banned the wearing of swords in public, the new ordinance went further and prohibited possession itself. From this point on, the Haitōrei still existed on paper but had lost any practical meaning.
On July 1, 1954 (Shōwa 29), the Haitōrei was formally repealed by the Act on the Arrangement of Laws Related to the Prime Minister’s Office (Act No. 203 of 1954).
That meant 78 years had passed since 1876, and an old Daijōkan decree had remained on paper for nearly a decade after the war.
Today, the law that governs swords in Japan is the Firearms and Swords Control Law (jūtō-hō).
Japanese swords with a blade longer than 15 cm (about 6 inches) may be owned and traded only with a registration certificate (tōrokushō) issued by the Board of Education of each prefecture. Possessing a Japanese sword without a registration certificate is illegal, so if you plan to buy a Japanese sword at an antique market or similar, be sure to confirm that the registration certificate is included.
If you intend to take a Japanese sword out of Japan as a souvenir, the regulations of your destination country also apply, in addition to Japan’s export procedures. Major destinations have very different rules:
Always check the latest customs and weapons regulations of your destination country in advance. Confirm requirements with the embassy or consulate of that country, or with the airline you use, before purchasing a sword to take home.

The Haitōrei was an edict that legally removed the “sword at the waist,” the symbol of the samurai class.
Behind it, the Conscription Ordinance and the modern police force had separated samurai from their state role, the Stipend Disposition had stripped away their economic base, and the Haitōrei took away the mark of their status. After the pain of the Shinpūren Rebellion and the Satsuma Rebellion, the age of the samurai quietly came to an end.
But the sword itself did not disappear. The skills of the smiths who turned to uchihamono evolved into today’s kitchen knife industry. The forging skills protected by smiths such as Gassan Sadakazu and Miyamoto Kanenori still live on in the tradition of Japanese swordmaking. Even after the era of the samurai ended, their culture survived in new forms.
Sites where you can trace the footprints of the Haitōrei still remain across Japan.
| Spot | Location | Related highlights |
|---|---|---|
| Kumamoto Castle | Chūō Ward, Kumamoto City | The site of the Kumamoto Garrison attacked in the Shinpūren Rebellion, where the artillery barracks were briefly captured |
| Sakurayama Shrine | Kurokami, Chūō Ward, Kumamoto City | A shrine enshrining 123 fallen warriors of the Shinpūren, with memorial monuments in the precincts |
| The Japanese Sword Museum | Sumida City, Tokyo | A museum dedicated to swords, run by the Society for Preservation of Japanese Art Swords |
| Nagoya Touken Museum (Nagoya Touken World) | Naka Ward, Nagoya City, Aichi | A comprehensive collection of Japanese swords, armor, and ukiyo - e |
| Seki Sword Tradition Museum | Seki City, Gifu | A facility that conveys the history of Seki's smiths as they shifted from swords to kitchen knives |
The story of the sword once called “the soul of the samurai,” and the great turning point of the era that surrounded it, is best traced where the real objects still live. Why not weave these places into your travels in Japan?

References: